Skip to main content
· 2/26/1982

Harley Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. Hartman

Citations

  • 442 A.2d 284
  • 296 Pa. Super. 37
  • 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • leave to amend proper “where there is some reasonable possibility that amendment can be accomplished successfully”
  • “where a trial court sustains preliminary objections on their merits, it is generally an abuse of discretion to dismiss a complaint without leave to amend”
  • “Even where a trial court sustains preliminary objections on the merits, it is generally an abuse of discretion to dismiss a complaint without leave to amend.” (citing Otto v. Am. Mut. Ins. Co., 482 Pa. 202, 205, 393 A.2d 450, 451 (1978))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Wieand, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.