Tessier v. Pietrangelo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding invalid a local court rule dispensing with oral argument for motion except when required by judge, as it directly conflicts with Pa.R.C.P. 211
• local rule dispensing with oral argument on motions unless requested by judge in direct conflict with Pa. R.C.P. No. 211, granting parties the right to argue any motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).