Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/19/2007
Rhodes v. State
Citations
- 735 N.W.2d 315
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 393
- 2007 WL 2051119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider an argument that was \simply a reformulation\ of petitioner's claim at trial and on direct appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gildea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- House v. BellSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 2,367×
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-25· cited 418×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-03-20· cited 119×
- Schleicher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-07-27· cited 67×
- Powers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-05-05· cited 50×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-06-07· cited 42×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-03-23· cited 41×
- Race v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-12-24· cited 27×
- State v. CramSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-03· cited 8×
- Crisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.