Reynolds v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Florida’s test for insanity is the M’Naughton Rule which provides that a defendant is not criminally responsible for his actions if at the time of the offense, by reason of mental disease or defect, the defendant: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dinkens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-13· cited 10×
• Herring v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-29· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Delva
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-21· cited 308×
• Goodwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1960-11-16· cited 212×
• Garron v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-05-19· cited 101×
• J.B. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-01-22· cited 85×
• Crump v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-06-10· cited 66×
• Nowitzke v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-12-06· cited 59×
• Gurganus v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 57×
• United States v. Marshall Crosby Milne
  Fifth Circuit· 1973-12-03· cited 19×
• Randall v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 18×
• Slawson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-05· cited 9×