Reyes v. Van Elk, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The IRCA requires employers to verify that each new hire is authorized to work in the United States. The employee must present documents establishing his or her identity and employment authorization.\
• “The IRCA requires employers to verify that each new hire is authorized to work in the United States. The employee must present documents establishing his or her identity and employment authorization.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jesus Leyva v. Medlin Industries Inc
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-05-28· cited 293×
• Voris v. Lampert
  California Supreme Court· 2019-08-15· cited 102×
• Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co.
  California Supreme Court· 2014-06-26· cited 69×
• Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial Relations
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-12-21· cited 25×
• Raef Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-09-20· cited 23×
• Department of Industrial Relations v. Davis Moreno Construction, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-03-16· cited 17×
• Burns v. California Fair Plan Ass'n
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-25· cited 13×
• Marquez v. City of Long Beach
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-02-25· cited 13×
• Gonzalez v. Performance Painting, Inc.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-01-10· cited 11×
• David v. Signal International, LLC
  E.D. Louisiana· 2009-04-02· cited 6×
• Martinez v. Regents of University of California
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-10-07
• ORAVECZ v. New York Life Ins. Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-05-11
• Gonzalez v. PERFORMANCE PAINTING, INC.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-03-23
• Marquez v. City of Long Beach
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-02-25
• Calleros v. Rural Metro of San Diego
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-12-15

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 2,631×
• De Canas v. Bica
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-25· cited 608×
• Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 575×
• Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
  Supreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 309×
• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 269×
• Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-13· cited 200×
• Loehr v. Ventura County Community College District
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-13· cited 137×
• Lusardi Construction Co. v. Aubry
  California Supreme Court· 1992-02-24· cited 121×
• Rajni J. Patel v. Quality Inn South, Manibhai Patel and Dilip Patel, Sumani Corp., Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-08-15· cited 114×
• San Francisco Labor Council v. Regents of University of California
  California Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 59×
• Mester Manufacturing Company v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-08-04· cited 57×
• Hernandez v. Paicius
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-03· cited 51×
• Flores v. Amigon
  E.D. New York· 2002-09-20· cited 49×
• Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-10-01· cited 37×
• Singh v. Jutla & C.D. & R's Oil, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2002-08-05· cited 34×
• Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2005-10-07· cited 34×
• Contreras v. Corinthian Vigor Insurance Brokerage, Inc.
  N.D. California· 1998-10-26· cited 23×
• Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-02-08· cited 20×
• Crespo v. Evergo Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-02-09· cited 16×
• Farmer Brothers Coffee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-10-17· cited 14×