Flores v. Amigon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the information was irrelevant and its minimal probative value outweighed by its potential for prejudice
• explaining that Hoffman “did not expressly deal with the circumstances presented here, where the plaintiffs ha[ve] already performed the work for which unpaid wages were being sought”
• preventing defendant's discovery of the plaintiff's immigration documents, Social Security numbers, and passports in a suit seeking unpaid wages under the FLSA
• excluding as not relevant plaintiff’s social security card and immigration status in FLSA overtime wages case
• finding enforcement of the FLSA “actually furthers the goal of the IRCA”
• “[T]he potential for prejudice far outweighs whatever minimal probative value [] information [about plaintiffs’ immigration status] would have.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).