Mester Manufacturing Company v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the court interprets a statute to avoid unreasonable results
• upholding determination that employer violated IRCA when employer took no action after receiving notice from INS that employees were possibly using false work authorization cards
• upholding determination that employer violated IRCA when employer took no action after receiving notice from INS that employees were possibly using false work authorization cards
• noting the employer’s general allegations of unreliability lacked any specific contention, supported by facts, to rebut the government’s finding that the specific employee had false documentation
• noting the employer’s general allegations of unreliability lacked any specific contention, supported by facts, to rebut the government’s finding that the specific employee had false documentation
• Employer violated IRCA’s continuing-to-employ prohibition when INS made a prima facie showing that an employee's authorization was false and employer failed to produce any evidence to the contrary.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).