Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 6/27/2016

BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Citations

  • 827 F.3d 1341
  • 119 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1236
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11687
  • 2016 WL 3514158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, based on the claim language and written description, the claims were directed to the ab- stract idea of filtering content on the Internet
  • holding that “filtering [in- ternet] content is an abstract idea because it is a longstand- ing, well-known method of organizing human behavior”
  • concluding that \content filtering system for filtering content retrieved from an [i]nternet computer network\ was directed to an abstract idea
  • holding that “filtering content is an abstract idea because it is a longstanding, well-known method of organizing human behavior, similar to concepts previously found to be abstract
  • describing similar patent as “not claiming the idea of filtering content simply applied to the Internet” but rather “a technology-based solution ... to filter content on the Internet that overcomes existing problems with other Internet filtering systems”
  • noting claims must be construed in favor of nonmovant on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, O'Malley, Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.