Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/27/1994

Republic Insurance v. Feidler

Citations

875 P.2d 187
178 Ariz. 528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that a voluntarily intoxicated insured may lack the mental capacity to form the intent required to invoke a policy exclusion for intentional acts of the insured
“When an insured assigns his right to sue his insurer under a liability policy, the assignee takes only those rights that the defendant had.”
“It has been stated that, when construing an exclusionary term in an insurance contract, the courts must examine the purpose of the exclusion, the public policy considerations involved, and the transaction as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lankford, Ehrlich, Fidel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Republic Insurance v. Feidler

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.