Ortiz v. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court may decide whether conduct within scope of employment as matter of law when material facts undisputed
• court may decide whether conduct within scope of employment as matter of law when material facts undisputed
• “principles arising from workers’ 20 compensation cases may also be invoked in respondeat superior cases when they are appropriate,” particularly when applied to tort action involving exclusive remedy provision of workers’ compensation statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-12-13· cited 27×
• Salerno v. Espinoza
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-06-23· cited 24×
• Lane v. City & Borough of Juneau
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2018-04-27· cited 15×
• Gnatkiv v. Machkur
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-24· cited 5×
• Komalestewa v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-10-20· cited 2×
• Manu Dube v. Chandra S. Desai and Patricia Desai
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-11
• McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-11-09
• Adam Goodman and Paul Underwood v. Blake Auton
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2022-11-03
• Doe v. Roman Catholic Church
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-06-29

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction Company
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-03-19· cited 68×
• Saala v. McFarland
  California Supreme Court· 1965-07-01· cited 66×
• Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission
  California Supreme Court· 1945-04-24· cited 55×
• Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-03-17· cited 50×
• Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. Gilbert
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1947-05-26· cited 43×
• Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-07-06· cited 42×
• Republic Insurance v. Feidler
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-01-27· cited 27×
• Anderson v. Gobea
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-10-17· cited 24×
• Robarge v. Bechtel Power Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-01-26· cited 21×
• Scheller v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-23· cited 21×
• Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 16×
• Love v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-02-23· cited 13×
• Olson v. Staggs-Bilt Homes, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-05-06· cited 11×
• Johnson Stewart Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-08-24· cited 10×
• Embree v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-03-21· cited 10×
• Duncan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-03-16· cited 9×
• Ohio Farmers Insurance v. Norman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-03-09· cited 8×
• Burnett v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-07-26· cited 6×
• Producers Cotton Oil v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-03-10· cited 4×