Skip to main content
· 11/12/1996

Ortiz v. Clinton

Citations

  • 928 P.2d 718
  • 187 Ariz. 294
  • 229 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 70
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court may decide whether conduct within scope of employment as matter of law when material facts undisputed
  • court may decide whether conduct within scope of employment as matter of law when material facts undisputed
  • “principles arising from workers’ 20 compensation cases may also be invoked in respondeat superior cases when they are appropriate,” particularly when applied to tort action involving exclusive remedy provision of workers’ compensation statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christopher M. Skelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.