Fish v. Fish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Georgia court had continuing jurisdiction when father lived in Georgia and children visited him there at least six times during the year
• finding adequate connection based on visitation during the month of July and five other times during the year
• “Based on [father’s] continuous residency, the significant relationship he maintains with his children, and the extended visitation in this State, it cannot be said that neither the children nor the parents in this case have a substantial connection with Georgia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Forlenza
  Texas Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 118×
• S.K.C. v. J.L.C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-19· cited 69×
• White v. Harrison-White
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2008-08-21· cited 34×
• Griffith v. Tressel
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-06-25· cited 33×
• Rennie v. ROSENTHOL
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-17· cited 31×
• Bellew v. Larese
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-07· cited 20×
• King v. King
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-02-04· cited 14×
• Croft v. Croft
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-11· cited 13×
• Murillo v. Murillo
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-09-10· cited 13×
• In the Matter of Mary E. Sheys and Eric Blackburn
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-07-15· cited 12×
• Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Grant
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-08-15· cited 11×
• State Ex Rel. Klein v. Winegar
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-04-25· cited 7×
• Hall v. Wellborn
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-02-10· cited 6×
• Plummer v. Plummer
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-08-17· cited 5×
• Hatch v. Hatch
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-10-15· cited 4×