Reisig v. Allstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policy with analogous BACPF, BACF, and UIM provisions was ambiguous on whether UIM coverage was limited to certain “covered autos” under Nebraska law and construing this ambiguity in favor of coverage for the insured
• finding ambiguity because the terms of the UIM endorsement conflicted with the introductory language \for a covered auto\
• finding ambiguity because the terms of the UIM endorsement conflicted with the introductory language \for a covered auto\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).