Skip to main content
· 4/17/2002

Stoddard v. Citizens Ins. Co. of America

Citations

  • 643 N.W.2d 265
  • 249 Mich. App. 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a similar UIM endorsement unambiguously provided coverage to a Class I insured even though the insured did not occupy a covered auto
  • determining that a similar UIM endorsement unambiguously provided coverage to a Class I insured even though the insured did not occupy a covered auto
  • finding that an interpretation that provided UIM coverage for an individual who was not in a “covered auto” was the only way to avoid rendering another section of the insurance policy redundant
  • discussed in more detail below

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Neff, Hoekstra

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.