· 4/17/2002
Stoddard v. Citizens Ins. Co. of America
Citations
- 643 N.W.2d 265
- 249 Mich. App. 457
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that a similar UIM endorsement unambiguously provided coverage to a Class I insured even though the insured did not occupy a covered auto
- determining that a similar UIM endorsement unambiguously provided coverage to a Class I insured even though the insured did not occupy a covered auto
- finding that an interpretation that provided UIM coverage for an individual who was not in a “covered auto” was the only way to avoid rendering another section of the insurance policy redundant
- discussed in more detail below
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Neff, Hoekstra
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.