Skip to main content
· 9/26/2012

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Haight

Citations

  • 697 F.3d 582
  • 2012 WL 4372520
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although settlement negotiations are not admissible at trial, they can be considered \to show the stakes\ when determining the amount in controversy
  • concerning a similar contractual provision wherein subsections applied only if an insured was an individual or a business, respectively
  • considering settlement negotiations when determining whether the amount in controversy requirement was satisfied
  • although settlement negotiations are not admissible at trial to prove liability for claim and its amount, they can be considered to determine amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction
  • “The rationale behind declining to require occupancy in a covered auto at the time of an accident is to protect the insured at all times against the risk of damages at the hands of underinsured motorists.”
  • “The rationale behind declining to require occupancy in a covered auto at the time of an accident is to protect the insured at all times against the risk of damages at the hands of underinsured motorists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.