Skip to main content

Reid v. Reid

Citations

  • 213 P.3d 353
  • 222 Ariz. 204
  • 561 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the failure to make findings required by A.R.S. § 25-403(B) constitutes legal error
  • declining to find waiver because the most important issue in custody disputes is a child’s best interests
  • explaining the requirement for findings on the record is to provide a baseline for “any future petitions by either party based on ‘changed circumstances”’
  • noting the inadequacy of a family court’s conclusion that it was in child’s best interest that mother retain custody without explaining why or which factors influenced its decision
  • noting no law “has created an unalterable rule mandating waiver in all instances” and finding mechanically applying waiver principles in this setting prevents development “of the baseline information required for future petitions involving a child or children’s best interests”
  • explaining the requirement for specific findings exists not only to aid an appellant and the reviewing court but also to aid all parties and the family court in determining the best interests of the children both currently and in the future

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winthrop, Hall, Irvine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.