Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/28/2009
Reid v. Reid
Citations
- 213 P.3d 353
- 222 Ariz. 204
- 561 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 673
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the failure to make findings required by A.R.S. § 25-403(B) constitutes legal error
- declining to find waiver because the most important issue in custody disputes is a child’s best interests
- explaining the requirement for findings on the record is to provide a baseline for “any future petitions by either party based on ‘changed circumstances”’
- noting the inadequacy of a family court’s conclusion that it was in child’s best interest that mother retain custody without explaining why or which factors influenced its decision
- noting no law “has created an unalterable rule mandating waiver in all instances” and finding mechanically applying waiver principles in this setting prevents development “of the baseline information required for future petitions involving a child or children’s best interests”
- explaining the requirement for specific findings exists not only to aid an appellant and the reviewing court but also to aid all parties and the family court in determining the best interests of the children both currently and in the future
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winthrop, Hall, Irvine
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nold v. NoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-30· cited 145×
- Deluna v. PetittoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-09-05· cited 79×
- Backstrand v. BackstrandCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-12-24· cited 64×
- Christopher K. v. Markaa S.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-10-31· cited 54×
- Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-04-13· cited 46×
- Olesen v. daniel/burgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-03-11· cited 21×
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-06· cited 17×
- Nicaise v. SundaramCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-03-01· cited 4×
- Meek v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-11-14· cited 2×
- Mesa v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-01-28· cited 2×
- Logan B. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-05-24· cited 1×
- Johnson v. ProvoyeurCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-26
- Francine C. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-23
- State v. Perez-GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-05-09
- Daniel Lachance, Henry Stephen Conroy v. County of Cochise Cochise County Jail DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-06-25
- Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony CelayaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-11-20
- Kamma v. GaunCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-12-18
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court· 1994-07-28· cited 152×
- In Re Marriage of PownallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-05-09· cited 111×
- Hays v. GamaArizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-25· cited 108×
- Owen v. BlackhawkCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-11-18· cited 98×
- In Re the Marriage of DiezsiCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-01-15· cited 91×
- Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-06-23· cited 82×
- Pridgeon v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 80×
- Hoffman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-09-02· cited 71×
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court· 1954-10-18· cited 63×
- In the Interest of P.M.B.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-08-31· cited 58×
- City of Tempe v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-07-18· cited 54×
- Galloway v. VanderpoolArizona Supreme Court· 2003-05-23· cited 42×
- Canty v. CantyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-05-10· cited 36×
- Downs v. SchefflerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-12-04· cited 31×
- State v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court· 1989-05-25· cited 30×
- Rosner v. Denim & Diamonds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-31· cited 24×
- Clifford v. WoodfordArizona Supreme Court· 1957-12-31· cited 24×
- Bayless Investment & Trading Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-04-01· cited 20×
- Callanan v. Sun Lakes Homeowners' Ass'n 1, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-08-24· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.