Arizona Supreme Court· 4/25/2003
Hays v. Gama
Citations
- 67 P.3d 695
- 205 Ariz. 99
- 398 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 24
- 2003 Ariz. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the superior court erred by precluding evidence as a sanction for violating court orders because the exclusion of that evidence affected the court’s ability to consider the child’s best interests
- holding courts shall consider all relevant evidence relating to the children’s best interests in custody disputes
- noting that the best interests of the child are the “paramount” consideration in child custody cases
- holding sanctions excluding evidence improperly restricted the court’s ability to consider the best interests of the child and should not have been imposed when other sanctions were available to vindicate the court’s authority
- explaining that in a custody case, a “child’s best interest is paramount”
- noting, in Title 25 child custody context, “[w]e have repeatedly stressed that the child’s best interest is paramount in custody determinations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nold v. NoldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-05-30· cited 145×
- Lehn v. Al-ThanayyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-07· cited 120×
- Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-28· cited 60×
- Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-01-20· cited 50×
- Gutierrez v. Hon. fox/kivlighnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-04-13· cited 46×
- Department of Child Safety v. BeeneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-07-24· cited 41×
- Downs v. SchefflerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-12-04· cited 31×
- Alvarado v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-05-31· cited 27×
- Navajo Nation v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-08-28· cited 20×
- Arizona Depatment of Economic Security v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-11-08· cited 13×
- Kelly v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-11-16· cited 11×
- Thompson v. CorryCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-15· cited 10×
- Dep't of Child Safety v. Stocking-TateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-06-14· cited 4×
- Paul E. v. Courtney F.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-04-03· cited 2×
- ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-11-08· cited 1×
- Lisa Frank v. James A. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-01-20
- Johnson v. ProvoyeurCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-07-26
- Jf v. Hon. como/cfCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-07-12
- James A. v. Dep't of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-03-29
- Nicaise v. Hon BernickCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-01-02
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 344×
- Unnamed caseEleventh Circuit· 2000-03-24· cited 92×
- Hoffman v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-09-02· cited 71×
- In the Interest of P.M.B.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-08-31· cited 58×
- Ong Hing v. ThurstonArizona Supreme Court· 1966-07-08· cited 35×
- Clifford v. WoodfordArizona Supreme Court· 1957-12-31· cited 24×
- Marriage of Woodworth v. WoodworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-03-26· cited 14×
- In Re the Marriage of GoveCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-12-17· cited 13×
- Franklin Tp. v. QuakertownNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-06-10· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.