Owen v. Blackhawk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the family court abused its discretion in changing the primary residential parent and altering the parenting time schedule without making the required findings on the record in a contested custody case brought under the relocation statute, A.R.S. § 25-408
• holding that the family court abused its discretion in changing the primary residential parent and altering the parenting time schedule without making the required findings on the record in a contested custody case brought under the relocation statute, A.R.S. § 25-408
• holding that in view of court’s failure to explain its consideration of relevant § 25-408 factors, reversal and remand was necessary because it was unclear whether court focused too much attention on one factor to the exclusion of others
• holding a substantial change in joint physical custody constitutes a change in custody requiring § 25-403 findings
• holding court abused its discretion by modifying custody without making findings on the record
• finding the court abused its discretion when changing the designation of the primary residential parent, when such a change had not been requested

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).