Skip to main content
N.D. Georgia· 8/2/2001

Reid v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.

Citations

  • 205 F.R.D. 655
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11685
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 631
  • 2001 WL 949960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that subjective decision-making may give rise to an inference of discrimination where there is evidence to provide a nexus between the subjective decision- making and discrimination
  • denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification based on a review of the record that the plaintiffs did not meet their burden on the commonality and typicality requirements
  • collective bargaining agreements and management directives for salaried positions introduced objective criteria with regard to promotions, which, along with lack of evidence of racial disparity, defeated class certification on basis of subjective decisionmaking
  • absent statistical information to buttress allegations, affiants’ statements of dissatisfaction with performance evaluations, without any factual basis for claiming they were the product of racial animus, insufficient to link personal injuries to the injuries of a class

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Reid v. Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.