Skip to main content

Garcia v. Veneman

Citations

  • 211 F.R.D. 15
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24113
  • 2002 WL 31830574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Commonality is defeated ... by the large numbers and geographic dispersion of the decision-makers .... ”
  • “Once the court disposes of a claim, the court need not consider the disposed-of claim as a basis for class certification.”
  • “A court may certainly decide dispositive motions prior to determining whether the case may be maintained as a class action.”
  • “Plaintiffs urge that wrongful destruction would warrant an adverse inference against defendant. It is not clear whether such an inference could be used to support a Rule 23(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Garcia v. Veneman

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.