Rehm v. Eckinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court prohibit deposition of individual under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(A) upon a showing of good cause
• holding the district court erred in concluding that the EEOC may not pursue a pattern-or-practice claim pursuant to its authority vested in Section 706
• explaining that the Sixth Circuit has always required a high-level executive deponent “to meet Rule 26(c)(1)’s requirements” to obtain a protective order blocking the deposition
• holding Swierkiewicz binds us without explaining what type of fact allegations make discrimination claims plausible
• noting that we review a district court’s decision regarding protective order for deposition for abuse of discretion
• holding instead that to justify a protective order under Federal Rule 26 (c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).