Skip to main content
· 9/28/1983

John Doe, Etc. v. A Corporation

Citations

  • 709 F.2d 1043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting with apparent approval that the District Court had granted pseudonymity \To prevent identification of the company and the possible disclosure of confidential information concerning its affairs\
  • noting with apparent approval that the District Court had granted pseudonymity “To prevent identification of the company and the possible disclosure of confidential information concerning its affairs”
  • noting the district court granted a motion to seal documents “to prevent possible disclosure of confidential information concerning [a company’s] affairs”
  • “This broad ethical duty protects not only against disclosure of privileged communications but also against the revelation of confidential information that is not privileged.”
  • house counsel, after resignation, barred by his ethical obligations as a lawyer from prosecuting litigation as class representative of other employees; case records sealed
  • house counsel, after resignation, barred by his ethical obligations as a lawyer from prosecuting litigation as class representative of other employees; case records sealed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rubin, Tate, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.