Skip to main content
· 10/20/2004

Regan v. Kootenai County

Citations

  • 100 P.3d 615
  • 140 Idaho 721
  • 2004 Ida. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject matter jurisdiction
  • holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject-matter jurisdiction
  • holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject-matter jurisdiction
  • holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject-matter jurisdiction
  • finding an adequate administrative remedy where the party was challenging the interpretation rather than the constitutionality of the statute at issue
  • The Regans’ failure to exhaust their administrative remedies deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction over their claim for declaratory relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Kidwell, Eismann, Burdick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.