· 10/20/2004
Regan v. Kootenai County
Citations
- 100 P.3d 615
- 140 Idaho 721
- 2004 Ida. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject matter jurisdiction
- holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject-matter jurisdiction
- holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject-matter jurisdiction
- holding that a reviewable final order is necessary for subject-matter jurisdiction
- finding an adequate administrative remedy where the party was challenging the interpretation rather than the constitutionality of the statute at issue
- The Regans’ failure to exhaust their administrative remedies deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction over their claim for declaratory relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Kidwell, Eismann, Burdick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.