Skip to main content
· 6/25/1968

Reed v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Citations

  • 44 Ala. App. 506
  • 214 So. 2d 857
  • 1968 Ala. App. LEXIS 512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding futility exception did not apply where communications relied upon notified plaintiff that more information was needed before a final decision could be made
  • finding Corps’ withdrawal of § 404 permit application was not a final decision, but simply a postponement of a final decision until all necessary information was submitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cates, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.