Mattos, Inc. v. Hash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that in an action for breach of warranty it is necessary to show that a warranty was breached and that this breach was the proximate cause of the injury
• protection against stale claims is the purpose of the statute of limitations, not the purpose of section 2-607(3)
• employee was injured by clamp purchased from defendant by employer for use by employees on the job
• protection against stale claims is the purpose of the statute of limitations, hot the purpose of section 2-607(3)
• protection against stale claims is the purpose of the statute of limitations, not the purpose of section 2-607(3)
• evidence supported jury’s determination that plaintiff auto body repairman did not act negligently or assume risk in using clamp purchased from defendant seller and, thus, could recover for breach of implied warranty of merchantability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).