Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/22/1972
Witherspoon v. Witherspoon
Citations
- 498 P.2d 233
- 17 Ariz. App. 391
- 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The failure to file an answering brief constitutes a confession of reversible error if the reasons presented for reversal are debatable, and it is our duty to determine whether these are debatable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krucker, Howard, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.