Supreme Court· 4/19/2023
Reed v. Goertz
Citations
- 598 U.S. 230
Oral argument
- ListenArgued60 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the question of when the “limitations period began to run” for Section 1983 procedural due process claim was “one of federal law”
- “Th[e] doctrine prohib- its federal courts from adjudicating cases brought by state- court losing parties challenging state-court judgments”
- “Th[e] doctrine prohib- its federal courts from adjudicating cases brought by state- court losing parties challenging state-court judgments”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brett Kavanaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesSeventh Circuit· 2024-08-01· cited 50×
- Connie Reguli v. Lori RussSixth Circuit· 2024-07-31· cited 30×
- Alyssa Reid v. James Madison UniversityFourth Circuit· 2024-01-09· cited 22×
- Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPASupreme Court· 2025-06-20· cited 15×
- Christine Gibbons v. Betty GibbsFourth Circuit· 2024-04-19· cited 14×
- Douglas Pell v. Amy NunezNinth Circuit· 2024-04-30· cited 13×
- Stephen Redd v. Patricia GuerreroNinth Circuit· 2023-10-20· cited 10×
- David Hieber v. Oakland County, Mich.Sixth Circuit· 2025-04-29· cited 7×
- Gutierrez v. SaenzFifth Circuit· 2024-02-08· cited 6×
- Reed v. GoertzFifth Circuit· 2025-05-01· cited 5×
- Wood v. PattonFifth Circuit· 2025-03-07· cited 4×
- Obert v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2024-11-12· cited 2×
- Moodenbaugh v. OSPCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-04· cited 1×
- Madeline Krasno v. Jennifer MnookinSeventh Circuit· 2025-08-01
- Wood v. PattonFifth Circuit· 2025-08-06
- Maurice Wells, Jr. v. Terry JohnsonFourth Circuit· 2025-08-12
- Curtis v. InsleeNinth Circuit· 2025-10-06
- Concord Hospital, Inc. v. P NH Department of Health and Human Services, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2024-08-05
- Norberto Torres v. Kent BrookmanSeventh Circuit· 2025-10-17
- Katrina Parker v. New Jersey Motor Vehicle CommissionThird Circuit· 2025-10-24
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 7,192×
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 6,493×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 4,974×
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 4,908×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 3,172×
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court· 1997-05-19· cited 2,485×
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,854×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 1,546×
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court· 2011-03-07· cited 1,318×
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 1,300×
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 1,133×
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,107×
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court· 2010-06-21· cited 922×
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 907×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.