Skip to main content
W.D. New York· 12/21/2018

Read v. Corning Inc.

Citations

  • 351 F. Supp. 3d 342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the disposal of ordinary materials that just happen to contain hazardous chemicals “is not so inherently dangerous as to give rise to strict liability.”
  • invoking the primary jurisdiction doctrine to dismiss plaintiff’s request for relief under CERCLA in favor of the state agency proceedings.
  • applying the primary jurisdiction doctrine to abstain from hearing Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) case where, inter alia, agency process “has advanced to the point where the DEC has actually approved a specific remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Read v. Corning Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.