532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal courts must generally follow decisions of the Appellate Divisions
• noting that the limitation imposed “affords a principled basis for reasonably apportioning liability”
• dismissing negligence claims based solely on economic loss as \fall[ing] beyond the scope of the duty owed [plaintiffs] by defendants\
• upholding dismissal of private nuisance claim \because plaintiff could not show that the harm threatened only one person or relatively few\
• upholding dismissal of private nuisance claim \because plaintiff could not show that the harm threatened only one person or relatively few\
• noting that the economic loss doctrine reflects “[p]olicy-driven line-drawing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).