Skip to main content

Ray v. State

Citations

  • 165 A.3d 408
  • 454 Md. 563
  • 2017 WL 3205520
  • 2017 Md. LEXIS 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in light of concerns for fairness and procedural safeguards in the criminal law context, “exclusive application of contract law is inappropriate”
  • a court “must determine what a reasonable lay person in the defendant’s position would understand the agreed-upon sentence to be, based on the record developed at the plea proceeding”
  • when terms of a plea agreement are clear and unambiguous, it is unnecessary to look elsewhere; but, if a disputed provision is ambiguous, we seek “to determine what a defendant reasonably understood at the time of [entering the] plea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.