Skip to main content

Hartman v. State

Citations

  • 156 A.3d 886
  • 452 Md. 279
  • 2017 WL 1131011
  • 2017 Md. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court may elect to review an unpreserved issue when there likely will be further proceedings
  • court may elect to review an unpreserved issue when there likely will be further proceedings
  • court may elect to review an unpreserved issue when there likely will be further proceedings
  • “[O]ur precedents recognize that constitutional issues raised for the first time on appeal, and not raised in the trial court, are not automatically entitled to consideration on the merits under Maryland Rule 8-131(a).”
  • review of unpreserved claims is discretionary, not mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.