Ravarino v. Price

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that promissory estop-pel is an exception to the “general rule that a mere promise as to future conduct will not work an estoppel”
• “These concepts are but forms designed to serve a more ultimate principle that no one shall induce another to act... and then after . . . repudiate the contract.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• part performance must be “clearly referable” to contract
• part performance must be \clearly referable\ to contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).