Bradshaw v. McBride

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[a]s a matter of law, [the plaintiff’s] acts did not constitute part performance” because the “uncontradicted testimony . . . established” that plaintiff “did not . . . perform . . . work in reliance on the contract”
• noting again that \[t]he 'claims' covered under [the limitation provision of the Probate Code] do not include claims for specific performance\
• explaining that a principal may subsequently ratify unauthorized agent acts
• refusing to enforce alleged oral contract where part performance not exclusively referable to it
• lack of knowledge by two tenants in common precludes ratification of sale by third tenant in common
• lack of knowledge by two tenants in common precludes ratification of sale by third tenant in common

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).