Coleman v. Dillman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs possession of house was not exclusively referable act to purported oral purchase contract because it was equally consonant with rental agreement
• discussing the doctrine of part performance as an exception to the statute of frauds
• bifurcation under rule 42 may be accomplished for the convenience and at the discretion of the trial court
• where issues are equitable in nature, a litigant is not entitled to a trial by jury as a matter of right
• where issues are equitable in nature, a litigant is not entitled to a trial by jury as a matter of right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).