Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Third Circuit· 3/11/1994

Rappa v. New Castle County

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 1043
  • 1994 WL 72658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the statutes regulate a private party’s speech on his or her own property” after concluding that several of the statutes’ provisions Vrere permissible under the First Amendment
  • noting that “the statutes regulate a private party’s speech on his or her own property” after concluding that several of the statutes’ provisions were permissible under the First Amendment
  • observing that when Supreme Court decision is plurality, withfive separate opinions issued by those agreeing as to judgment, it is difficult to ascertain what is \law of land\ and guiding principles
  • “Eliminating the offending exception would mean that we would be requiring the State to restrict more speech than it currently does.”
  • listing the Foman factors as 19 those to be considered when deciding whether to grant leave to 20 amend
  • “Eliminating the offending exception would mean that we would be requiring the State to restrict more speech than it currently does.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, Becker, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rappa v. New Castle County

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.