Skip to main content
· 9/24/2002

Shenango Incorporated v. Apfel

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 174
  • 29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2168
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the only binding aspect of a fragmented decision without a narrower ground is the specific result
  • stating that the only binding aspect of a fragmented decision without a narrower ground is the specific result
  • affirming that Government could assign benefits to employees under the Coal Act even after end of the statutory deadline for such assignment because the statutory timeframe was not meant to strip the Government of power to act beyond the deadline
  • “[A] statutory deadline does not, by itself, establish that Congress intended to ship an agency’s authority to act after the deadline has passed.”
  • “The standard of review in cases of 16(a)(1)(A) (“An appeal may be taken statutory construction is plenary.”). 5 district court must be submitted to any issue referable to arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.