Third Circuit· 9/24/2002

Shenango Incorporated v. Apfel

Citations

307 F.3d 174
29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2168
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the only binding aspect of a fragmented decision without a narrower ground is the specific result
stating that the only binding aspect of a fragmented decision without a narrower ground is the specific result
affirming that Government could assign benefits to employees under the Coal Act even after end of the statutory deadline for such assignment because the statutory timeframe was not meant to strip the Government of power to act beyond the deadline
“[A] statutory deadline does not, by itself, establish that Congress intended to ship an agency’s authority to act after the deadline has passed.”
“The standard of review in cases of 16(a)(1)(A) (“An appeal may be taken statutory construction is plenary.”). 5 district court must be submitted to any issue referable to arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.