Sixth Circuit· 9/11/2019
William Thomas v. Clay Bright
Citations
- 937 F.3d 721
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Reed supersedes Central Hudson
- striking down on-premises exemption because it could not pass strict scrutiny as a content-based regulation
- “The [Tennessee] Billboard Act’s on- premises exception scheme is a content-based regulation of (restriction on) free speech.”
- “Because the on-premises exception is not severable from the Billboard Act, we must consider the Act as a whole”
- “The Billboard Act’s on-premises exception scheme is a content-based regulation of (restriction on) free speech.”
- “Tennessee’s Billboard Act contains a non-severable regulation of speech based on the content of the message.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLCSupreme Court· 2022-04-21· cited 145×
- Norton Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Village of St. Bernard, OhioSixth Circuit· 2024-04-19· cited 8×
- L.D. Mgmt. Co. v. Jim GraySixth Circuit· 2021-02-16· cited 6×
- Richard Clemons v. John CouchSixth Circuit· 2021-07-07· cited 6×
- Willey v. Harris County DAFifth Circuit· 2022-03-11· cited 5×
- Clear Channel Outdoor v. Dept. of FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-06-09· cited 4×
- Clear Channel Outdoor v. Dir., Dept. of Finance Balt. CityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-01-29· cited 3×
- Reagan Natl Advtsng of Austin v. City of AuFifth Circuit· 2020-08-26
- ELEVATION OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, LLC v. CITY OF PIGEON FORGE, TENNESSEECourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2025-05-30
- Dennis Scott v. City of Daytona Beach, FloridaEleventh Circuit· 2026-06-25
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 1,847×
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 1,732×
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 1,695×
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,551×
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court· 2010-04-20· cited 1,327×
- Widmar v. VincentSupreme Court· 1981-12-08· cited 1,319×
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court· 2015-06-18· cited 1,319×
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court· 1981-07-02· cited 1,213×
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 1,104×
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 986×
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 930×
- City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 856×
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 839×
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 838×
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 746×
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court· 1991-12-10· cited 673×
- City of Ladue v. GilleoSupreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 627×
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 516×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.