Skip to main content

Randolph v. State

Citations

  • 608 So. 2d 573
  • 1992 WL 338533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There are, of course, cases in which the minimum value of an item of property is ‘so obvious as to defy contradiction.’ ” (quoting Jackson v. State, 413 So.2d at 114-115)
  • state failed to prove that value of stolen property was over $300 where it presented no description of the stolen items or testimony as to their age or condition; no evidence of purchase price or replacement cost
  • state failed to prove that value of stolen property was over $300 where it presented no description of the stolen items or testimony as to their age or condition; no evidence of purchase price or replacement cost

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.