J.O. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• victim's statement that \practically brand new\ video equipment had been stolen was insufficient to prove property stolen had value of more than $300

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bloodsaw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 16×
• Randolph v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-20· cited 11×
• Dumervil v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-14· cited 2×
• JO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-14
• O.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-27· cited 46×
• In Interest of FR
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-10· cited 26×
• Beasley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-31· cited 23×
• Evans v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-06· cited 20×
• Butler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-01-24· cited 11×
• D.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-18· cited 7×
• F.W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-11-20· cited 5×
• J.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-06· cited 4×