Skip to main content

D.H. v. State

Citations

  • 864 So. 2d 588
  • 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the State’s argument that “the description of the items stolen, by their sheer number and type, indicates a value over $300”
  • rejecting State’s argument that the sheer number of items, including DVD player, a Sony Playstation, and cameras, was sufficient to prove that the stolen items had a value that met the grand theft minimum
  • rejecting State's argument that the sheer number of items, including DVD player, a Sony Playstation, and cameras, was sufficient to prove that the stolen items had a value that met the grand theft minimum
  • in a case involving theft of electronics, among other items, 2 rejecting “the State’s argument that the description of the items stolen, by their sheer number and type, indicates a value over $300”
  • state failed to establish value of $300 or more of DVD player, computers, Sony PlayStation2, cameras and other items where victim testified to purchase price of some items; court rejected argument that “sheer number and type” of items established value over $300

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casanueva, Fulmer, Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.