Skip to main content

Ramirez v. State

Citations

  • 13 S.W.3d 482
  • 2000 WL 221870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence counsel struggled to “serve two masters” shows that an accused’s defense has been impaired
  • holding that evidence counsel struggled to “serve two masters” shows that an accused’s defense has been impaired
  • determining that there was actual conflict where lawyer represented simultaneously defendant and witness who testified that defendant made incriminating statements in prison because attorney “was forced to choose between what was best for appellant (aggressively cross-examining Crabb
  • to prove adverse effect once actual conflict is established, appellant need not show that conflict changed outcome of trial
  • to prove adverse effect once actual conflict is established, appellant need not show that conflict changed outcome of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.