Skip to main content
· 6/20/1995

Scott C. Ciak v. United States

Citations

  • 59 F.3d 296
  • 1995 WL 368699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Teague's \new rule\ ban does not proscribe application of a rule well-established under circuit precedent, even if Supreme Court jurisprudence contains no precise analog
  • reversing a conviction on the grounds that \the Supreme Court in Wood v. Georgia stated that Cuyler . . . requires reversal where a trial court neglects its duty to inquire about a particular conflict\
  • reversing a con- viction on the grounds that \the Supreme Court in Wood v. Georgia stated that Cuyler . . . requires reversal where a trial court neglects its duty to inquire about a particular conflict\
  • defendant’s attorney’s “actual and possible conflicts of interest require automatic reversal of [defendant’s] conviction because the trial court failed to conduct any inquiry”
  • in criminal prosecution, counsel sought to impeach a key government witness who was former client in forfeiture case stemming from same prosecution
  • possible conflict arising from counsel's pri- or representation of important government witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Altimari, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.