· 6/20/1995
Scott C. Ciak v. United States
Citations
- 59 F.3d 296
- 1995 WL 368699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Teague's \new rule\ ban does not proscribe application of a rule well-established under circuit precedent, even if Supreme Court jurisprudence contains no precise analog
- reversing a conviction on the grounds that \the Supreme Court in Wood v. Georgia stated that Cuyler . . . requires reversal where a trial court neglects its duty to inquire about a particular conflict\
- reversing a con- viction on the grounds that \the Supreme Court in Wood v. Georgia stated that Cuyler . . . requires reversal where a trial court neglects its duty to inquire about a particular conflict\
- defendant’s attorney’s “actual and possible conflicts of interest require automatic reversal of [defendant’s] conviction because the trial court failed to conduct any inquiry”
- in criminal prosecution, counsel sought to impeach a key government witness who was former client in forfeiture case stemming from same prosecution
- possible conflict arising from counsel's pri- or representation of important government witness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miner, Altimari, Cabranes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.