Skip to main content
· 6/24/2009

Ramirez v. Rodriguez (In Re Ramirez)

Citations

  • 413 B.R. 621
  • 2009 WL 1856059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a motion to remand was timely when made within thirty days of removal
  • “The TUFTA claim is an action to avoid the alleged fraudulent transfers, which is part of the illustrative list of core proceedings under § 157(b)(2) ... [therefore, the TUFTA claim is core.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marvin Isgur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.