Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim against third party was related to bankruptcy because any liability would be shared by estate and third party
• holding that \related to\ jurisdiction over third-party action existed because assets at issue in claims against debtor were property of estate
• holding that although post-petition claims generally are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, they can be if they “affect the estate”
• holding that claim against third party was related to bankruptcy because any liability would be shared by estate and third party
• holding that “‘arising in’ proceedings are those that are not based on any right expressly created by title 11, but nevertheless, would have no existence outside of the bankruptcy . . . .”
• holding that a matter is “related to” a bankruptcy case as that phrase is used in 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) if “the outcome of that proceeding could conceivably have any effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).