Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund, Inc. v. TXU Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal under Rule 9(b) where there was “no evidence at the time the statement was made [defendant] was aware or should have been aware” of its falsity
• affirming dismissal under Rule 9(b) where there was “no evidence at the time the statement was made [defendant] was aware or should have been aware” of its falsity
• affirming dismissal under Rule 9(b) where there was “no evidence at the time the statement was made [defendant] was aware or should have been aware” of its falsity
• affirming dismissal under Rule 9(b) where there was “no evidence at the time the statement was made [defendant] was aware or should have been aware” of its falsity
• interpreting Rule 9(b) to require these allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).