Skip to main content

Ramirez v. GEICO

Citations

  • 548 S.W.3d 761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff claiming misrepresentation under the Insurance Code must point to an express misrepresentation or omission but did not require reliance as an independent element
  • “Because ‘payment in full’ is an affirmative defense for which a defendant bears the burden of proof, Geico could not raise such a defense in a no-evidence motion for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hughes, McClure, Rodriguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.