Railco Multi-Construction Co. v. Gardner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a manifestation rule on coverage “is most consistent with the intent of the D.C. Council”
• date of compensation for occupational hearing loss fixed by date cumulative loss occurred, not date first loss occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).