King v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The difference between the typical case of a discrete accident causing an injury (including an aggravating injury
• “The difference between the typical case of a discrete accident causing an injury (including an aggravating injury
• “it is settled that injury resulting from cumulative trauma in the workplace is compensable under the WCA”
• “It is well settled that ‘an aggravation of a preexisting condition may constitute a compensable accidental injury under the Act.’” (quoting Ferreira v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp. Servs., 531 A.2d 651, 660 (D.C. 1987))
• “If the agency fails to make a finding on a material, contested issue of fact, this court cannot fill the gap by making its own determination from the record, but must remand the case for findings on that issue.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).