Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 9/6/2017

R-S-C v. Sessions

Citations

  • 869 F.3d 1176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that noncitizens subject to reinstated removal orders may not apply for asylum but may seek withholding of removal through withholding-only proceedings
  • denying petition for review upon concluding that the Attorney General has reasonably concluded that a person ordered removed “is not eligible for asylum relief” and deferring to that interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.