Tenth Circuit· 9/6/2017
R-S-C v. Sessions
Citations
- 869 F.3d 1176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that noncitizens subject to reinstated removal orders may not apply for asylum but may seek withholding of removal through withholding-only proceedings
- denying petition for review upon concluding that the Attorney General has reasonably concluded that a person ordered removed “is not eligible for asylum relief” and deferring to that interpretation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bhaktibhai-Patel v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2022-04-27· cited 44×
- Lucio-Rayos v. SessionsTenth Circuit· 2017-11-14· cited 40×
- Bradford v. U.S. Department of LaborTenth Circuit· 2024-04-30· cited 13×
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrN.D. California· 2019-07-24· cited 12×
- L-M-PBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2018-07-01· cited 3×
- A-S-MBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2021-04-09
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 1,506×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court· 1999-05-03· cited 1,159×
- Fernandez-Vargas v. GonzalesSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 429×
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court· 1804-02-22· cited 400×
- Fong Haw Tan v. PhelanSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 354×
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 322×
- Serra v. LappinNinth Circuit· 2010-04-09· cited 223×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ErricoSupreme Court· 1967-01-16· cited 214×
- Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. HowardSupreme Court· 2012-11-26· cited 214×
- Fany Ramirez-Mejia v. Loretta LynchFifth Circuit· 2015-07-21· cited 182×
- Rony Perez-Guzman v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2016-08-31· cited 76×
- Herrera-Molina v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2010-03-03· cited 46×
- Dino Jimenez-Morales v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2016-05-02· cited 42×
- Yoselin Martinez Cazun v. Attorney General United StateThird Circuit· 2017-05-02· cited 34×
- Garcia-Garcia v. SessionsFirst Circuit· 2017-05-03· cited 32×
- Cordova-Soto v. HolderTenth Circuit· 2011-10-17· cited 31×
- Anderson v. NapolitanoFifth Circuit· 2010-07-09· cited 12×
- American Federation of Government Employees v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityTenth Circuit· 2016-09-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.