Nitro-Lift Technologies, L. L. C. v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Oklahoma courts may not reform non-compete agreements that violate section 219A
• explaining that “the ancient interpretive principle that the specific governs the general” applies to provisions of “equivalent dignity”
• reiterating that state supreme courts must adhere to United States Supreme Court’s interpretations of the FAA
• reiterating that state supreme courts must adhere to United States Supreme Court's interpretations of the FAA
• reiterating that state supreme courts must adhere to United States Supreme Court's interpretations of the FAA
• explaining that where a specific statute conflicts with a general provision, \the specific governs the general\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).