Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 7/18/2006

R. Edward Bates v. R. James Nicholson

Citations

  • 20 Vet. App. 185
  • 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 571
  • 2006 WL 1984600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Failure to prevail does not raise a presumption that the government's position was unreasonable.\
  • issuance of writ of mandamus compelling administrative review conferred prevailing status
  • Secretary's interpretation was substantially justified
  • Secretary’s interpretation was substantially justified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagel, Moorman, Schoelen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.