Veterans Claims· 7/18/2006
R. Edward Bates v. R. James Nicholson
Citations
- 20 Vet. App. 185
- 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 571
- 2006 WL 1984600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Failure to prevail does not raise a presumption that the government's position was unreasonable.\
- issuance of writ of mandamus compelling administrative review conferred prevailing status
- Secretary's interpretation was substantially justified
- Secretary’s interpretation was substantially justified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hagel, Moorman, Schoelen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.